Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: Deck Metrics on May 13, 2011, 02:40:00 PM
-
And when the south wind blew softly , supposing that they had obtained their purpose, loosing thence, they sailed close by Crete. But not long after there arose against it a tempestuous wind, called Euroclydon.
Acts 27:13-14
evil enhancement
Interrupt all set-aside cards, discard one good fortress in an opponent's set-aside.
card image here http://barzdovg666.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/shipwreck_euroclydon.jpg (http://barzdovg666.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/shipwreck_euroclydon.jpg)
mohahahaha!!!! :P sink the fishing boat!
-
I'd make it in play or set-aside...Otherwise it'd be scarcely used.
-
it should be oronge brigade
-
Crimson, so you can play it on Leviathan.
-
Crimson/Orange - Best of both worlds!
Or just reprint Leviathan into Orange and give him a better effect.
-
We have no evidence that the animal in question was a demon.
-
Actually Leviathan technically shouldn't be in the game, but because he is, he's technically a beast and all beasts are demons, under Redemption Rules.
Besides, he does need a reprint. He would be better w/ one.
-
Actually Leviathan technically shouldn't be in the game, but because he is, he's technically a beast and all beasts are demons, under Redemption Rules.
Besides, he does need a reprint. He would be better w/ one.
He's not a beast he's an animal.
-
it say that in the rule book i think
-
TPNo is correct, Leviathan is an animal, not a beast or demon.
I agree with it being crimson just cuz I like crimson. :P
-
Actually Leviathan technically shouldn't be in the game, but because he is, he's technically a beast and all beasts are demons, under Redemption Rules.
Besides, he does need a reprint. He would be better w/ one.
Where in the rules does it say that?
-
I'm pretty sure the rulebook gives Levitation as an example of a Beast.
-
True, Leviathan has beastly numbers (though technically an animal). However, it is not a demon.
Though the REG does say it's male. hmm....
-
SomeKittens is not saying that Leviathan is a beast in redemption. Other than him being totally beastly. He is an animal. Not a demon. Not a beast.
-
in the g/h rule book it says that he is an animal
-
can we actually make this card so I might be able to beat somekittens for once?
-
Then Leviathan doesn't block people from rescuing Lost Souls, he's just an animal. So that wouldn't make sense in Redemption.
I say that this card should be Crimson/Orange still.
-
SomeKittens is not saying that Leviathan is a beast in redemption. Other than him being totally beastly. He is an animal. Not a demon. Not a beast.
My wording could have been better (I'll fix it). Here's the REG
Leviathan (Pa)
Type: Evil Char. • Brigade: Crimson • Ability: 12 / 12 • Class: None • Special Ability: All effects of all enhancements with ship in the title are negated. Leviathan cannot be captured. • Play As: Negate all enhancements with the word "ship" in the title. Protect Leviathan from capture abilities. • Identifiers: OT Male Animal • Verse: Psalms 104:26 • Availability: Patriarchs booster packs (Ultra Rare)
See also:
• Negate
• Protect
-
it also says that on the h/g rule book p.38
-
smileys that this site needs to add :popcorn: it doesnt work here so no one gets that reference but on absolutepunk.net that emoticon is a guy eating popcorn and drinking pop, implying the he finds this debate entertaining. i had to explain it therefore its not cool anymore
-
why are we even talking about leviathan when this topic is not about him at all ::)
-
why are we even talking about leviathan when this topic is not about him at all ::)
welcome to internet forums. at least this off topic is still about redemption
-
why are we even talking about leviathan when this topic is not about him at all ::)
It's something called a Red Haring.
-
I might think you knew what you were talkin about if you could spell herring.
-
Okay, my spelling isn't the best in world! So sue me! I never said that I was an excellent speller.
-
And yet the two best browsers (both of which are free) have spellcheck.
-
And yet the two best browsers (both of which are free) have spellcheck.
Stop trolling. My internet explorer costs $40 a month, and I didn't even know it had spell check!
-
And yet the two best browsers (both of which are free) have spellcheck.
Stop trolling. My internet explorer costs $40 a month, and I didn't even know it had spell check!
2 things. First, internet explorer doesn't have spell check google chrome and mozilla firefox do. Second. Please tell me you meant that you're paying 40 bucks a month for internet and not for internet explorer. if you're paying for IE you need to go on a shooting rampage
-
If you're using IE you're doing it wrong.
smileys that this site needs to add :popcorn: it doesnt work here so no one gets that reference but on absolutepunk.net that emoticon is a guy eating popcorn and drinking pop, implying the he finds this debate entertaining. i had to explain it therefore its not cool anymore
On several forums I frequent, "*grabs lawn chair and popcorn*" suffices for this.
This enhancement could be very good as a crimson/orange territory class enhancement with some minor modifications. I would do... "Negate and discard all cards in set-aside areas, or protect all Lost Souls from rescue this round."
-
Actually I have Safari and it has a spell check, but it didn't catch that.