Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on September 12, 2008, 05:36:41 PM
-
Doubting Gabriel 2/3 pale green/orange enhancement
"Place this card on a human hero. All good enhancements used by that hero are negated unless there is an angel in battle. If that hero is blocked by doubt remove this hero from the game. Discard this card after five turns."
Luke 1:19-20 19. The angel answered, "I am Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you and to tell you this good news. 20. And now you will be silent and not able to speak until the day this happens, because you did not believe my words, which will come true at their proper time."
"In Seclusion" Gold enhancement
"Set aside one female hero for 4 turns. Upon return search draw pile for one male hero with no special ability. Place that hero in play. That hero gains the identifier "Enhancements used by this hero cannot be interrupted."
Luke 1:24 After this his wife Elizabeth became pregnant and for five months remained in seclusion.
-
not bad
-
hahaha, I like that it gains an identifier, not a special ability. Go Windows abuse :D
-
Doubting Gabriel 2/3 pale green enhancement
"Place this card on a human hero. All enhancements on that hero are negated unless there is an angel in battle. Discard this card after five turns."
Love the card, but needs to be reworded. Right now, it's negated. You place it on a hero, and it negates all enhancements placed on that hero. It need to negate all enhancements USED by that hero. But I love the card. Even more than the other one.
-
Oops XD Thanks for catching that. Edited.
-
imo the Doubting one should be Orange but other wise I like the ideas.
-
I might be wrong(in fact, I'm pretty sure there's a very good chance), but saying "enhancements ON that hero" seems like the wrong word choice. Unless that's what you want. Do you want to negate provisions, or all enhancements used by that hero? If you want to negate like provisions, then keep it. And I like the idea of orange as well.
-
I might be wrong(in fact, I'm pretty sure there's a very good chance), but saying "enhancements ON that hero" seems like the wrong word choice. Unless that's what you want. Do you want to negate provisions, or all enhancements used by that hero? If you want to negate like provisions, then keep it. And I like the idea of orange as well.
+ 1 nice catch there
-
Re-reedited. Yeah I am just an ideas man. I'm not too good with wording.