Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: SomeKittens on September 12, 2010, 01:40:08 PM

Title: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: SomeKittens on September 12, 2010, 01:40:08 PM
Meaningless!
Evil dominant

Discard any card in play, set aside, in deck, discard pile or Land of Redemption with a 2 John reference

Ecclesiastes 1:2 "Meaningless! Meaningless!"
       says the Teacher.
       "Utterly meaningless!
       Everything is meaningless."

I'd like the card image to be the Redemption logo divided by zero.  Don't feel like making the full 'shoop.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: The Warrior on September 12, 2010, 01:41:18 PM
wyn
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 12, 2010, 04:11:34 PM
Pancakes are made out of pancakes.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: SomeKittens on September 12, 2010, 04:30:11 PM
But that one actually does something...
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 12, 2010, 04:47:06 PM
FioHP is useful now. ET+That=win the battle.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: The M on September 12, 2010, 05:00:09 PM
Meaningless 3: Protect all lost souls from rescue for three turns. Decrease all characters in play by X.
X = number of no special ability O.T. human heroes in your territory.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: The Warrior on September 12, 2010, 05:44:46 PM
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fonokinegrindz.typepad.com%2Fono_kine_grindz%2Fimages%2FHawaiiEditionSpamCan-thumb.JPG&hash=a42928a97a4171f9e4516dd4fcee0d4caf8f7dde)
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: SomeKittens on September 12, 2010, 06:02:44 PM
Here's the one we need:
Hyper-Powerful Admin:
Negate and Discard all spam currently in thread.

I like Meaningless enough, I think I'll make it.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: CJSports on September 13, 2010, 06:30:45 PM
What cards are 3rd John.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: browarod on September 13, 2010, 06:54:29 PM
What cards are 3rd John.
There aren't any, that's the point of the card, lol.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: CJSports on September 13, 2010, 07:10:40 PM
Ohhhhhhhhhhh ok gotcha, now i love this card.  :laugh:
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: SomeKittens on September 13, 2010, 07:14:56 PM
Though watch a super-powerful 3 John card come through in Apostles 3 next year.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: browarod on September 13, 2010, 07:19:29 PM
So, what exactly happens when you discard a card already in the discard pile?
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Professoralstad on September 13, 2010, 09:56:25 PM
What cards are 3rd John.
There aren't any, that's the point of the card, lol.

You better come up with a proof that 2=0 real quick, or Imma call you a liar.

(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redemptionreg.com%2FREG%2FLinkedDocuments%2FDemetrius%2520%28Ap%29.gif&hash=51c32227deb601346d28e0abfc0508758bcdedcc) (https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redemptionreg.com%2FREG%2FLinkedDocuments%2FDiotrephes%2520%28E%29.gif&hash=2346e8a002a772b20e1893def48e6a17b5a780b1)

Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on September 13, 2010, 10:05:48 PM
a = b
a – b = 0
(a – b)/(a – b) = 0 / (a-b)
1*2 = 0*2
2=0

INB4DIVIDEBY0
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Master KChief on September 13, 2010, 10:09:33 PM
so now, the point of this thread is meaningless.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 13, 2010, 10:11:15 PM
Isn't it II John?
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Josh on September 13, 2010, 10:13:11 PM
a = b
a – b = 0
(a – b)/(a – b) = 0 / (a-b)
1*2 = 0*2
2=0

INB4DIVIDEBY0
I'm doubting some of your transitions in that equality.  Let me try:

a = b
a^2 = ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
Factor difference of squares...
(a - b)(a + b) = b(a-b)
Divide by common denominator...
a + b = b
Substitute b for a, since a = b...
b + b = b
2b = b
2 = 1

It's not quite 2 = 0, but with a little manipulation, you could probably get there  :)
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: browarod on September 13, 2010, 10:48:27 PM
/facepalm

I really need to shoot the thing in my head that's pretending to be my brain. Then I need to find my actual brain again.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Professoralstad on September 13, 2010, 10:49:27 PM
Isn't it II John?

Yes.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Prof Underwood on September 13, 2010, 11:46:49 PM
And here we have the problem.  (a-b)(a+b) is really a^2 - 2ab - b^2.  You are missing the middle term.
Oops, that must be why I teach science and not math.

(a - b)(a + b) = b(a-b)
Divide by common denominator...
a + b = b
There's the real problem.  The "common denominator" there is (a-b) which is 0 based on the given that a=b.  Therefore you are dividing by zero which is impossible.  Very nicely done though :)
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: SomeKittens on September 14, 2010, 12:29:43 AM
I put 2 John in the first place.  What are you guys talking about?

WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Josh on September 14, 2010, 08:10:08 AM
a^2 - b^2
Factor difference of squares...
(a - b)(a + b)
And here we have the problem.  (a-b)(a+b) is really a^2 - 2ab - b^2.  You are missing the middle term.
Not quite.  Using FOIL method: 
(a + b)(a - b) = a^2  - ab + ab - b^2
Combine like terms...
a^2 - b^2

Bonus points go to the person who can name the flaw in my equality  :) 
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: browarod on September 14, 2010, 09:18:15 AM
You mean besides dividing by 0?
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Josh on September 14, 2010, 12:52:44 PM
Congratulations to browarod and Prof U for solving the riddle!  browarod was first, so he wins 9001 bonus points.  Unfortunately bonus points are pretty much worthless; in fact, they are worth $-1/20th of one cent, meaning you now owe me $4.50.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: CJSports on September 14, 2010, 03:00:57 PM
Geese guys this is all my fault i thought it was third john not second my bad but the question now is there a card from second john.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Professoralstad on September 14, 2010, 03:15:49 PM
Geese guys this is all my fault i thought it was third john not second my bad but the question now is there a card from second john.

No. Second John is the only book of the Bible with no current Redemption cards. I'm pretty sure it's been that way ever since Obadiah was printed.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Ninja Duck on September 14, 2010, 09:33:29 PM
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: The Warrior on September 14, 2010, 09:34:40 PM
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
still wouldnt work
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Warrior_Monk on September 14, 2010, 09:37:17 PM
Almost as meaningless as a dominant with no special ability. Like New Jerusalem in a deck with no Son of God. Hmm, that'd be interesting. you just have to time it so you drop it before your opponent drops his with Son of God. (If played at the same time as...)
NJ would still be useful. You could play it with Presented before the Lord, or discard it to get rid of Sin in the Camp or Confusion of Mind.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on September 14, 2010, 09:43:48 PM
DOMINANT: RING WRAITH
EVIL
SA: THIS CARD HAS NO EFFECT.
IDENTIFIERS: DOES NOT COUNT AS A CARD FOR GAME OR DECK BUILDING PURPOSES.
Title: Re: A dominant everyone can agree on:
Post by: Warrior_Monk on September 14, 2010, 09:45:54 PM
DOMINANT: RING WRAITH
EVIL
SA: THIS CARD HAS NO EFFECT.
IDENTIFIERS: DOES NOT COUNT AS A CARD FOR GAME OR DECK BUILDING PURPOSES.
spam. that card is the same as the one posted at the beginning of this here thread.

does that mean I'm meaningless?
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal