Author Topic: To Change Or Not To Change  (Read 1607 times)

Ironica

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
To Change Or Not To Change
« on: January 12, 2010, 11:27:16 PM »
0
I am considering changing the offense of my site-lock deck. As of right now, it is a judge offense with a splash of red warriors.  The two main focus of the offense. First was to go against multiple color defenses (by using stronghold/TLFFY/and a couple of judges cards that hurt multiple color defense). The second part was to put a 1/1 judge into the judge seat (make the judge 1/1 by a desease card I would place on myself) and slowly killing off all their defense.  This worked great with a site-lock defense since I needed a lot of time to get it going and to finish it (going into nationals, I was wondering how often I would time out).

So now that I am taking another look at my decks, I would like to change the offense to something that still works good with a site-lock defense but is faster than the offense I have now so incase my drawing doesn't allow me to wait, I have a better chance in winning.  The defense will stay brown due to the fact that I don't have most of the pali cards to change the defense.

So....what offense works great with a brown site-lock defense?

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: To Change Or Not To Change
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2010, 11:33:42 PM »
0
I would do royalty. It is small and it can recur. Also you could throw in the one brown ec that gains 1/1 for each purple hero discarded.
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: To Change Or Not To Change
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2010, 12:57:08 AM »
0
You could go with Genesis.  Jacob + Jacob's Dream is nice for site lock decks.

Offline redemptioncousin

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 543
  • God made that... :)
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: To Change Or Not To Change
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2010, 10:13:15 AM »
0
I too, think genesis is the way to go.  Recurring RTC with Asher over and over is pretty nasty.
Gates of Hell is by far the best card in the game.  No questions asked.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: To Change Or Not To Change
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2010, 11:16:47 AM »
0
Genesis does have Jacob's Dream and Well Reopened. However, Gold has Joshua and Vengeance of Eternal Fire...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: To Change Or Not To Change
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2010, 11:50:18 AM »
0
I'd say royalty or genesis, both are strong, royalty is a bit quicker of the two though. I focus on ignores for purple, so using IATruth with them also gives it some more CBN if that is what you are after.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal