Author Topic: The New Kids on the block (Read 187676 times)

Daniel TS RED · « **Reply #575 on:** May 25, 2007, 11:22:26 AM »

I would say jump right into t2. It's a little more complex then t1 I agree, but it's not like night and day, it's still redemption. If you're want'n to try it out Yoda, go for it. It's the only way you learn is to play the games. Even if you don't have all the super duper cards for t2, it's no biggy.

Daniel

toad92 · « **Reply #576 on:** May 25, 2007, 12:52:27 PM »

Quote from: Yoda on May 24, 2007, 11:20:13 PM

P.S. Go back to my T1 deck. For my brown defence I have:

King Ahaziah
King Jeroboam I
King Joram

This is kind of important since I've got a tournament saturday.

What do you guys/gays thnk of those 3 cards.

New Raven BR · « **Reply #577 on:** May 25, 2007, 01:13:44 PM »

LOL!!!XD ROFL!

i see a classic quote

Quote

What do you guys/gays thnk of those 3 cards.-yoda

Daniel TS RED · « **Reply #578 on:** May 25, 2007, 03:01:45 PM »

i'm pretty sure he was mean'n gals on that post. If those are the only cards you have for a brown defense, I wouldn't use brown. The "good" Black/Crimson cards found in the G/H starter would be a better base defense to use. Maybe try a sitelockout with those or pick a different color. Brown is tough, but I don't think you have the ECs for it.

Daniel

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #579 on:** May 25, 2007, 03:40:46 PM »

"2 is VERY expensive for a decent deck for a new player"
Uhm it CAN be if you use the standard AOCP offense. There are some very cost effective defenses.

Daniel TS RED · « **Reply #580 on:** May 25, 2007, 04:14:33 PM »

PoF x 5 will get ya started for about $1 or so. Theres a small chunck of your off.

Daniel

toad92 · « **Reply #581 on:** May 25, 2007, 04:53:24 PM »

I'm gong to but some kings and try to get some Pharaohs.

Deathschythe · « **Reply #582 on:** June 06, 2007, 01:49:18 PM »

Quote from: The Raven on May 25, 2007, 01:13:44 PM

LOL!!!XD ROFL!

i see a classic quote

Quote
What do you guys/gays thnk of those 3 cards.-yoda

Are we supposed to stay on-topic?

toad92 · « **Reply #583 on:** June 07, 2007, 08:35:49 AM »

toad92 · « **Reply #584 on:** June 16, 2007, 09:18:00 PM »

I twiked the deck a little bit so I"m going 2 repost it.

Cameron the Conqueror · « **Reply #585 on:** June 18, 2007, 08:50:11 PM »

T1 is better i think

Newsboys crazy · « **Reply #586 on:** June 28, 2007, 09:58:40 PM »

Yoda if you are going for a crimson defense you should try finding Leviathan in the unlimited boaster packs. Also try for fed to the lions and other discard hero in battle or territory cards.

The Roc_1217 · « **Reply #587 on:** June 29, 2007, 12:57:42 AM »

Quote from: Newsboys crazy on June 28, 2007, 09:58:40 PM

Yoda if you are going for a crimson defense you should try finding Leviathan in the unlimited boaster packs. Also try for fed to the lions and other discard hero in battle or territory cards.

Leviathan is in Patriarchs. Red Dragon is in unlimited.

LukeSnyder · « **Reply #588 on:** June 29, 2007, 11:04:39 AM »

Quote from: Newsboys crazy on June 28, 2007, 09:58:40 PM

fed to the lions

That would actually be coliseum lions.

Newsboys crazy · « **Reply #589 on:** June 29, 2007, 03:11:10 PM »

If Leviathan is not in unlimited then how come I got in my starter kit with 6 unlimited boaster packs?

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #590 on:** June 29, 2007, 03:16:23 PM »

Packing error maybe.

LukeSnyder · « **Reply #591 on:** June 30, 2007, 11:08:26 AM »

No, that was the G and H tin, it came with six rares/ultras from patriarch and apostles.

Daniel TS RED · « **Reply #592 on:** June 30, 2007, 03:37:41 PM »

if it came with packs, chances are it's not the tin that came with singles.

Daniel

The Roc_1217 · « **Reply #593 on:** June 30, 2007, 03:46:29 PM »

Some came with singles and uLim packs.

Daniel TS RED · « **Reply #594 on:** June 30, 2007, 03:52:04 PM »

oh, i'm prolly wrong then. My gift set came with 6 blue packs, so I just figure'd that's the one he was talk'n about.

Daniel

the Unknown · « **Reply #595 on:** July 06, 2007, 08:21:34 PM »

at the bigginning of this topic (I didn't bother to read it all, I mean 40 PAGES!!!!) they were talking about banding. I see how banding is good in its way, but couldn't one instant win take out all the evil/good characters banded into battle. I mean isn't it better to have a deck built off mostly instant wins.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #596 on:** July 06, 2007, 08:33:24 PM »

By instant if you mean battle winner? yes. If you mean Dominant (lamb/reaper) Nope. And also no. Some ecs are immune to instant wins and single heros

the Unknown · « **Reply #597 on:** July 11, 2007, 08:55:41 PM »

by instant wins, I was talking about cards like Great Image.

The Roc_1217 · « **Reply #598 on:** July 11, 2007, 09:15:13 PM »

Not all cards target all cards in battle. Banding not only gives you higher numbers, but also makes it so your opponent has to take out more targets.

sepjazzwarrior · « **Reply #599 on:** July 12, 2007, 12:51:28 AM »

I think what he's talking about is cards like deluge of rain and joseph in prison. I used to have the same feelings about banding. If you stick all your heroes in battle at once and they play a card like that they would all be gone and youd be in big trouble. That's why any more I usually stick to fight by the number banding and watch out for simon and ashera pole.

News:

Author Topic: The New Kids on the block (Read 187676 times)

toad92

toad92

Deathschythe

toad92

toad92

Newsboys crazy

Newsboys crazy

the Unknown

the Unknown