Author Topic: Less versatility in type 2 this year?  (Read 5015 times)

Offline Mr.Hiatus

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« on: March 27, 2011, 01:31:50 AM »
0
With Disciples being so dominating over not just defenses, but voted as top brigade head and shoulders above the rest, why use other brigades and strategies if you are playing competitively?

Most people are splashing Disciples with what they think to be the most balanced mix, and I even commented earlier this year saying how the top deck at nationals will be the deck that can consistently beat Disciples, which also means the best Disciples deck possibly. I think if it was not for the new sites hurting each colors main offensive weapon, then more colors would be played this year. But every offensive weapon was nulled this year, and Thaddeus is a beast. So why use other brigades? My favorite offense is Gold/White. TGT ladies with He Is Risen, and TC converts for gold, throw some Abomb in for defense and you're golden. But now Chorazin stops TC and Golgotha stops TGT, I'm not complaining I am just stating that I can no longer use that strategy. Yes I can add Benedictus/Consider the Lillies, but that takes away from my offense, which makes it weaker. Nazareth hurts a lot, if not almost all, of greens majority battle winners, silver is still lacking, same with red, and blue took a big hit due to Zebulun/Jacob getting slapped by Golgotha. So really that only leaves the new shiny Disciples who have so much to offer, didn't get hurt, has new battle winners, new bands, multiple new ways to keep them alive, can draw, can search, and Fishing Boat for infinite protected site access. Which I would like to add how much I love to use sites for T2 defense, no point really anymore thanks to FBoat/CP.
So saying all this I go back to my original question, do you think there is going to be less versatility in MN for Nats '11 due to Disciples being so strong? Or do you think maybe in a few months people will not have room for every site in their deck and other colors will be played again? I just hope the new set brings about characters/TC enhs/artifacts that negate sites for a turn, or a set aside for X amount of turns sites are negated. I am beyond excited for nationals this year, but at the same time I'm thinking to myself, am I going to be playing 6 rounds of type 2 2 player, 4 of those rounds I will probably see the same offense...I sure do hope not.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2011, 02:15:00 AM »
0
It really depends how things develop over the next few months. If people realize a couple ways to counter (not even counter specifically, maybe just slow) disciples, say with the new Goliath, then things may turn out okay.

At the T2 only, I used TGT + Silver with some pharisees and got second place due to the fact I'm not a very good player (made a stupid mistake against Gabe....). The deck had also had done fairly well outside of the tournament, as it's either been winning or had a close game (defining that as within a soul or two) against some top players (Justin, Nathan, Gabe (except for one game where he destroyed me), etc). So I honestly don't think that disciples are going to be the only competitive offense, as I see TGT being competitive and perhaps some prophet stuff to a lesser extent. That being said, if Nationals were tomorrow I'd have no reason not to play disciples, so I agree with you for the most part.

Also, I know John Earley pointed out something interesting to me. Many decks are going to be designed to stop Disciples, and he said that herods are one of the best defenses for doing so (I'm just taking his word for it. I haven't played much with disciples or herods...). Coincidentally, herods happen to be pretty weak against the garden ladies. That could very well give a TGT deck the edge it needs.

As for sites, I do feel Golgotha, Nazareth, and CP are going to be staples, less so with Market Place and I don't expect Chozarin to be played much. I'm really hoping defenses change. I've loved my pharisees defense beings it's been both fast enough to deck me out but beefy enough to let me win, but I just can't see myself using it come State/Regional/Nationals. I have a counter to Thaddeus in 5x Balaam's Disobedience, but angels absolutely kill me. Just last tournament Justin Alstad walked in for 5or6orsomething souls with Captain even when I had Holy of Holies up. I was able to stall with pretension, but that's about all I did, considering most of my defense was Gold Shield and Balaam's with some capturing stuff that's easily shut down. I've tried adding Prince of the Air (which is also another character to play my Destructive Sin on), but he just hasn't done enough.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2011, 02:52:06 AM »
0
If Captain is giving you the blues with a Phars defense, a WC character with Bow and Arrow is a good answer.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2011, 09:42:04 AM »
0
Yes, if any color can put a hurt on silver- it would be a grey defense. So I expect there to be some answer. That being said, Baalam's Disobedience pushes people into grey to help against Disciples. It also pushes people into a silver offence to counter this card. I dont care what anybody says Zebulan/Jacob/Captain is still a force to be reckoned with. I also expect silver/green to be strong with Simeon, Anna, and Seraph and Herods as well. Still, Disciples will rule the top table-especially in type 1. Maybe Job.dek in multiplayer if some speed elements are included but i still see disciples ruling every event.

Quote
As for sites, I do feel Golgotha, Nazareth, and CP are going to be staples, less so with Market Place and I don't expect Chozarin to be played much.

This is a true statement, however i also feel like itll be a different story as people start throwing in cards at the last second, especially with a defense no one has spoken of yet...heretics.

Benedictus/Consider the Lillies is needed for those TGT/AoC lovers, but will there be many Evil Forts showing up? Kingdoms is still running strong and Herods Temple is as evil as they come but how do you kill these? especially with teal taking a backseat to CP. Anyone try Benedictus abuse with teal so thier Zeals can 2 for 1?
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2011, 09:48:10 AM »
0
The only thing Ive seen is A Soldiers Prayer abuse with Trumpet and Sword but not alot. Thadd stops demon defences too. No trembling demon abuse this year. All in all I would very much practice the mirror match if I was you guys and try to find some tech to stop the guy across the table from you as he'll probably be playing something from the above.

And with that I leave you with this...Mayhem turn 1 is hard to beat but any other time it usually helps so...To Nazzy or not to Nazzy-that is the question.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2011, 09:51:40 AM by RTSmaniac »
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5484
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2011, 09:59:55 AM »
0
I would tend to agree with Mr.Hiatus. If you want to win at Nats you are most likely going to want to run a Disciples-based offense. To make things a bit sadder, you are also going to be running one of a limited set of defenses.

Unless you think/believe that everyone will abandon pre-block ignore, you are going to want to use Golgotha. This will push a number of players towards NT based defenses.  Granted the disciples have no pre-block ignore, so you kind of win there, but still...

If Captain is giving you the blues with a Phars defense, a WC character with Bow and Arrow is a good answer.
And at the mention of a WC character you should be thinking Naaman. Naaman + Bow and Arrow is a beast against angels.

Many decks are going to be designed to stop Disciples, and he said that herods are one of the best defenses for doing so (I'm just taking his word for it. I haven't played much with disciples or herods...). Coincidentally, herods happen to be pretty weak against the garden ladies. That could very well give a TGT deck the edge it needs.
Although I would disagree about Herods being the "best" anti-disciples defense, I would point out that your observation is true.  Defenses that are strong against a disciples offense are (in general) going to be relatively weak against the garden gals (and to a lesser extent a Jars-centered offense), and vice versa.  This is a very interesting situation that can be taken advantage of.

(A larger problem is that defenses that are the most capable against disciples are like the Herods in that they have limited generic character support and so tend to lead to be harder to be useful in T2.)

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2011, 01:22:28 PM »
0
Disciples will be the most common offense, but not as common as you may think. I'm pretty sure only 4ish people used Disciples at the T2 only. I do agree with Sauce that you'll probably only see threeish offenses (if you're lucky) after the first few rounds.

As far as defenses go, Pharisees are super super common, as they play first immunity or protection. I'm guessing at nats that'll be different. Herods can hurt disciples the most, but aren't the best way to stop disciples. Demons aren't as bad as you think, unless they use ET (which I don't think many do), you have Strong Demon to beast their Thad. Also, a splash magician or W/C defense with Gib's Trick, Forgotten History, and the Plot would stall plenty long. Phillies are also going to be great with Goliath's Armor and Goliath, not to mention Land Dispute to take out the sites that kill your offense.

And never forget side battles.  ;D

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2011, 01:45:18 PM »
0
Disciples will be the most common offense, but not as common as you may think. I'm pretty sure only 4ish people used Disciples at the T2 only.
There's got to be more then that. Although I can only seem to name 4.... And two of the three people who placed used them.

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2011, 02:18:28 PM »
0
There were five.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2011, 02:49:38 PM »
0
...

And never forget side battles.  ;D

As much fun as everyone is having with the Pot of Manna thread, I guarantee there will be some top notch T2 players who will miss out on placing only because they didn't have a Pot or two.  ;)
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5484
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2011, 03:01:49 PM »
0
Disciples will be the most common offense, but not as common as you may think. I'm pretty sure only 4ish people used Disciples at the T2 only.
And those four people took first, third, fourth, and ??? in the tournament. That kind of success breed imitation. You also need to remember the T2 only doesn't accurately predict future popularity. The year when Priests came out, I was the only player at the T2 only to play PG banding with 2kH and Forgotten History. At MN State a few months later six of the the top seven spots went to that defense.

Quote

And never forget side battles.  ;D
In general side battles are a bit too iffy to count on as a primary strategy.

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2011, 03:05:53 PM »
0
I took 9th wtih Disciples, but I lost the last round to the Disciples deck that placed 3rd, so I was in there fighting during the last round.

What do you guys think of Syrians against Disciples? Syrians can take advantage of Bow and Arrow for Silver (especially with Naaman) and Balaam's Disobedience, have horses if wanted, have big characters, and have a capture that puts the disciple into the Opponent's land of bondage. I shockingly think they might have a chance.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2011, 03:14:26 PM by Alex_Olijar »

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2011, 03:09:59 PM »
0
I took 9th wtih Disciples, but I lost the last round to the Disciples deck that placed 2nd, so I was in there furing the last round.
Not true >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #13 on: March 27, 2011, 03:12:38 PM »
0
I took 9th wtih Disciples, but I lost the last round to the Disciples deck that placed 2nd, so I was in there furing the last round.
Not true >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c >:c

I thought Josh got second and you got third?

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2011, 03:13:35 PM »
0
No way. We both had the same points, but my differential was fantastic.

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2011, 03:14:09 PM »
0
No way. We both had the same points, but my differential was fantastic.

Oh, duh. I should have remember how bad you crushed that differential. My bad.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2011, 03:26:23 PM »
0
I know somebody else (don't really want to give it away...just in case) used Disciples, but their deck was actually gardenciples, so I didn't count that.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5484
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2011, 04:49:59 PM »
0
No way. We both had the same points, but my differential was fantastic.
Don't get carried away, dude.  LS differential was only like 21-9 in your favor.  With five rounds 35 would have been fantastic, but 21?

Offline everytribe

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1063
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2011, 05:27:00 PM »
0
Having checked in all the decks at the Type 2 only, I think Type 2 will have plenty of versatility in it at Nationals. (My three deck checkers couldn't make it at the last minute.) I feel that a Disciples deck is pretty predictable and since it came out early as the favorite strategy, players will have good ways to counter it by Nationals. There is alot of creativity in the Redemption Type 2 community and not all will come succumb to the lure of the Disciples. North Central Regions on Memorial Day Weekend will be a good test.
Old Guys Rule

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2011, 07:21:46 PM »
0
yeah, versitility at the bottom. zing.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5484
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2011, 08:08:15 PM »
0
On the bright side, every round you lose will decrease your chance of facing a disciples deck.  ;)

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #21 on: March 28, 2011, 12:24:16 AM »
0
What do you guys think of Syrians against Disciples? Syrians can take advantage of Bow and Arrow for Silver (especially with Naaman) and Balaam's Disobedience, have horses if wanted, have big characters, and have a capture that puts the disciple into the Opponent's land of bondage. I shockingly think they might have a chance.

and dont forget about House of Rimmon. also alot of your syrians work great if converted. I just dont see anyone using Bow and Arrow. My favorite card in grey is fearfulness with high places.
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline Mr.Hiatus

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #22 on: March 28, 2011, 10:21:22 PM »
0
Everything Syrians play is protected if Thad has enough of his homies out. So I don't see Syrians hurting Di too much.

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #23 on: March 28, 2011, 10:33:13 PM »
0
Right, and even if they block high aocp will kill them off.

Offline Mr.Hiatus

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #24 on: March 28, 2011, 10:43:18 PM »
0
I think the top states/regionals will showcase the most popular decks, and the winners of those tournaments, like every year, will have their deck re-created for nationals, if just depends on what is used at these tournaments, and if people are prepared for the top decks/offenses. The best way to beat Disciples is to win before the end of the game. You have to have counters throughout the game in order to stop their attacks and stall them, so you can win first, before crazy man Thad comes to town with his homies.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5484
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #25 on: March 29, 2011, 01:01:33 PM »
+1
Right, and even if they block high aocp will kill them off.
For any younguns who may be reading this...It is never ok to block high.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #26 on: March 29, 2011, 01:10:53 PM »
0
Right, and even if they block high aocp will kill them off.
For any younguns who may be reading this...It is never ok to block high.

Just say no.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Less versatility in type 2 this year?
« Reply #27 on: March 29, 2011, 03:30:24 PM »
0
Right, and even if they block high aocp will kill them off.
For any younguns who may be reading this...It is never ok to block high.
Build a deck with all 1/1's.  Then play CoT.  Then play the cov that reduces EC's.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal