Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Deck Concepts => Topic started by: Red Dragon Thorn on September 19, 2018, 12:28:55 PM

Title: Black is weak
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on September 19, 2018, 12:28:55 PM
Maybe this will help:

Spoiler (hover to show)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: soul seeker on September 19, 2018, 12:34:36 PM
I like the rework!  My cards are in storage atm so I'm not sure of wording, but can Cloud Moses shut his ability down while in territory?  (Asking if this was intentional to make it possible to drop AotL on him if someone desired)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Gabe on September 19, 2018, 12:37:12 PM
I like the rework!  My cards are in storage atm so I'm not sure of wording, but can Cloud Moses shut his ability down while in territory?  (Asking if this was intentional to make it possible to drop AotL on him if someone desired)

Moses (CoW) will not stop this card during battle unless he's banded in (by Faith of Samuel for example).
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Asahel24601 on September 19, 2018, 12:41:10 PM
So much yes. Canaanite support and big protection from dominants block? This should be good.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Ironisaac on September 19, 2018, 12:42:11 PM
Finally, a fair match up for The Mighty Warrior in the cosmic contest of who has the best thighs!
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: redemption collector 777 on September 19, 2018, 12:42:49 PM
A reverse Emperor Claudius?? cool.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Xonathan on September 19, 2018, 12:44:14 PM
Awesome card. Can he be warrior class?  :angel:
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Gabe on September 19, 2018, 12:46:21 PM
Awesome card. Can he be warrior class?  :angel:

Sure! 8)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Xonathan on September 19, 2018, 12:48:58 PM
(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1714/8579/products/Foreign_Sword__RA2_1024x1024@2x.jpg?v=1529476578)

Foreign Sword and KoT FTW
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: sepjazzwarrior on September 19, 2018, 01:01:17 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Xonathan on September 19, 2018, 01:04:16 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back

(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1714/8579/products/Siseras_Oppression__CoW_1024x1024@2x.jpg?v=1529202877)


Edit: I feel like there is another card but I can't remember. You can get some synergy with this bad boy too.

(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1714/8579/products/086-Idols-of-Canaan_1024x1024@2x.jpg?v=1529535168)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Asahel24601 on September 19, 2018, 01:14:20 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back
If they give KoT Warrior class as Xonathan suggested, Foreign sword can topdeck them, which basically makes it draw one to put a Canaanite on top of your deck.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: redemption collector 777 on September 19, 2018, 01:29:54 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back


I kinda agree with the cost benefit. Seems a little too costly to give a Canaanite to draw 1 card.

Maybe it could be draw 2 or some other small ability??
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Xonathan on September 19, 2018, 01:39:10 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back


I kinda agree with the cost benefit. Seems a little too costly to give a Canaanite to draw 1 card.

Maybe it could be draw 2 or some other small ability??

Consider that the Canaanite is coming from the reserve so its easy to setup the give with a weak sauce Canaanite. Next turn, you come in with Ehud or Asahel for an easy battle.  There is some synergy with the cards mentioned above plus maybe some new cards will interact with given away Canaanites.

I for one like that we are getting cards with a cost for benefit abilities.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Bobbert on September 19, 2018, 01:56:38 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back


I kinda agree with the cost benefit. Seems a little too costly to give a Canaanite to draw 1 card.

Maybe it could be draw 2 or some other small ability??

Consider that the Canaanite is coming from the reserve so its easy to setup the give with a weak sauce Canaanite. Next turn, you come in with Ehud or Asahel for an easy battle.  There is some synergy with the cards mentioned above plus maybe some new cards will interact with given away Canaanites.

I for one like that we are getting cards with a cost for benefit abilities.

I love cost/benefit as well, but giving your opponent ECs is a pretty steep cost. Grabbing it from Reserve is better, but I don't want to put worthless characters in my deck if I can avoid it. See my post in New Card Ideas for my thoughts on the subject.  ;)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: SiLeNcEd_MaTrIx on September 19, 2018, 02:17:24 PM
Maybe they have a black Canaanite coming that does something bad if you give to your opponent from reserve! PLOT TWIST!  ;)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Gabe on September 19, 2018, 03:40:37 PM
Ever since Canaanites were introduced they have benefited from plaguing the opponent's territory. That's made red (Asahel) and gold (Ehud) two of the most popular pairings with Canaanites. Sisera's Oppression and Idols of Canaan (mentioned below) are a couple examples of Canaanite themed cards that benefit from an opponent controlling a Canaanite.  I'm certain there will be more in the future.

Foreign Sword could not be used to topdeck the Canaanite "donated" by KoT since the opponent doesn't own the card ("opponent's" requires ownership and control). But IIRC KoT doesn't require that you give the Canaanite. I think it plays out like this - You may take a Canaanite from Reserve. You may give it to opponent's territory to draw 1.

We have a series of "Doomed" characters coming in 6 of the 7 evil brigades. How fun would this card be?

Spoiler (hover to show)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Bobbert on September 19, 2018, 03:52:58 PM
I love it, but that's a weird verse for a card called "Doomed Canaanites"....  :o

I am curious to hear more about these doomed cards though. Sounds like maybe one for a major civ in each brigade, with a reference to prophecy about their destruction? Sounds sweet 8)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Red on September 19, 2018, 04:07:23 PM
I love it, but that's a weird verse for a card called "Doomed Canaanites"....  :o

I am curious to hear more about these doomed cards though. Sounds like maybe one for a major civ in each brigade, with a reference to prophecy about their destruction? Sounds sweet 8)
Context my boy, context. That verse is part of a prophetic oracle against Tyre and Philistia. Tyre was a major Canaanite center, thus "King of Tyrus".
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kor on September 19, 2018, 11:39:22 PM

Spoiler (hover to show)

Curious as to the usefulness of the * ability.  Wouldn't it just discard itself on your opponent's first turn?

Also, why limit one per territory?  If there was more than one they could just discard each other until there was only one left and it wouldn't be a problem.

Or am I just entirely misunderstanding this card?
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kevinthedude on September 19, 2018, 11:43:07 PM

Spoiler (hover to show)

Curious as to the usefulness of the * ability.  Wouldn't it just discard itself on your opponent's first turn?

Also, why limit one per territory?  If there was more than one they could just discard each other and it wouldn't be a problem.

Or am I just entirely misunderstanding this card?

Maybe it could be each discard instead so if they want to get rid of it for free first turn they have to not play anything?
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: ChristianSoldier on September 20, 2018, 01:40:44 AM
Foreign Sword could not be used to topdeck the Canaanite "donated" by KoT since the opponent doesn't own the card ("opponent's" requires ownership and control). But IIRC KoT doesn't require that you give the Canaanite. I think it plays out like this - You may take a Canaanite from Reserve. You may give it to opponent's territory to draw 1.

When you give a card to an opponent they gain Permanent Control to them, which according to the REG treats the card as if it were theirs.

From the REG
Quote
Permanent Control
If a player has permanent control of a card, then he can treat that card as if it came from his deck. By default, a player has permanent control of all cards on the playing surface that he owns. A player also has permanent control of all cards in their hand. A player may gain permanent control of an opponent's card with a take or give effect that targets that card, or by using an exchange effect that exchanges one of the player's cards with an opponent's card. See Control.

Unless I'm completely missing the point of this definition, if seems to me that it Foreign Sword would work on a character Given by King of Tyrus.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kor on September 20, 2018, 07:42:35 AM
+1 with ChristianSoldier, otherwise Asahel shouldn’t work either.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Gabe on September 20, 2018, 11:37:30 AM
Unless I'm completely missing the point of this definition, if seems to me that it Foreign Sword would work on a character Given by King of Tyrus.

The portion of the REG you quoted isn't the key to determining if Foreign Sword works in this scenario. The following is found in the REG Glossary under Opponent.

Quote
Several cards in Redemption® refer to “opponent’s cards” (e.g., opponent’s Heroes). For a card to be considered an “opponent’s card”, that player must be the owner of the card as well as have control of the card. An “opponent’s” ability is an ability on an “opponent’s” card.

...otherwise Asahel shouldn’t work either.

Asahel doesn't work because he specifies "opponent's male human", unlike Ehud (RA) who simply says "from opponent's territory". I've only used gold Judges with Canaanites myself (because AUTO) and just assumed Asahel had the same wording as Ehud. My bad. Jael still works though.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Master Q on September 20, 2018, 12:23:10 PM
Back in black! Rock on! 8)

But IIRC KoT doesn't require that you give the Canaanite. I think it plays out like this - You may take a Canaanite from Reserve. You may give it to opponent's territory to draw 1.

I can see where you're coming from (good ol' Reach o' Desperation logic), but this is a cost/benefit, whereas Reach is not. Seems to me that, as worded, it would require the give to gain the draw. It reads like this:

"You may take a Canaanite from Reserve and give it to opponent's territory to draw 1."

The benefit (draw 1) only happens if the conditions before the to are met. Therefore, you must both A) Take a Canaanite from Reserve and B) give it to opponent's territory to C) draw 1. If you cannot fulfil either A or B, then C doesn't occur. That's what I would say, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong.


Just throwing some ideas out there, what if instead of draw 1, it was draw X (X = # of good brigades in battle)? Or give the Canaanite to take an evil card from Reserve? In any case, I'm digging it. Canaanites need a 'boss' character so bad.

Can't wait to see this KoT as a borderless card!
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kor on September 20, 2018, 12:34:03 PM


...otherwise Asahel shouldn’t work either.

Asahel doesn't work because he specifies "opponent's male human", unlike Ehud (RA) who simply says "from opponent's territory". I've only used gold Judges with Canaanites myself (because AUTO) and just assumed Asahel had the same wording as Ehud. My bad. Jael still works though.

Thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Watchman on September 20, 2018, 01:01:05 PM
Judean Mediums banded to new KoT. An auto-block guarantee.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kevinthedude on September 20, 2018, 01:07:23 PM
Judean Mediums banded to new KoT. An auto-block guarantee.

Assuming they have no regardless of protection or Eternal Inheritance.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Ironisaac on September 20, 2018, 01:08:03 PM
Judean Mediums banded to new KoT. An auto-block guarantee.

Assuming they have no regardless of protection or Eternal Inheritance.

Or NT heroes...
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: RedemptionAggie on September 20, 2018, 01:18:13 PM
"You may take a Canaanite from Reserve and give it to opponent's territory to draw 1."

The benefit (draw 1) only happens if the conditions before the to are met. Therefore, you must both A) Take a Canaanite from Reserve and B) give it to opponent's territory to C) draw 1. If you cannot fulfil either A or B, then C doesn't occur. That's what I would say, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong.

You have to give to draw, but you don't have to give. You can gain a Canaanite or the drawn card.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Watchman on September 20, 2018, 02:12:40 PM
Judean Mediums banded to new KoT. An auto-block guarantee.

Assuming they have no regardless of protection or Eternal Inheritance.

Or NT heroes...

True on NT heroes. Not worried about RoP (unless there are more cards in the new set that’re RoP for offense) and EI though.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: ChristianSoldier on September 20, 2018, 02:47:42 PM
Unless I'm completely missing the point of this definition, if seems to me that it Foreign Sword would work on a character Given by King of Tyrus.

The portion of the REG you quoted isn't the key to determining if Foreign Sword works in this scenario. The following is found in the REG Glossary under Opponent.

Quote
Several cards in Redemption® refer to “opponent’s cards” (e.g., opponent’s Heroes). For a card to be considered an “opponent’s card”, that player must be the owner of the card as well as have control of the card. An “opponent’s” ability is an ability on an “opponent’s” card.

Yes, but I knew that. I was just showing that according to the rules (at least as I read them(, once a player has Permanent Control of a card, they are considered an owner.

Quote
Owner
When a reference is made to the owner of a card, it means the player from whose deck or Reserve the card originated

Combined with the definition I already said about Permanent Control treating the card as coming from Your Deck, that means that once you gain Permanent Control of a card you are treated as the owner, so Foreign Sword should work. Or did I misinterpret something?
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Master Q on September 20, 2018, 03:01:50 PM
"You may take a Canaanite from Reserve and give it to opponent's territory to draw 1."

The benefit (draw 1) only happens if the conditions before the to are met. Therefore, you must both A) Take a Canaanite from Reserve and B) give it to opponent's territory to C) draw 1. If you cannot fulfil either A or B, then C doesn't occur. That's what I would say, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong.

You have to give to draw, but you don't have to give. You can gain a Canaanite or the drawn card.

Indeed. I misread what was being said and we are in complete understanding after all.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: RedemptionAggie on September 20, 2018, 03:27:25 PM
Unless I'm completely missing the point of this definition, if seems to me that it Foreign Sword would work on a character Given by King of Tyrus.

The portion of the REG you quoted isn't the key to determining if Foreign Sword works in this scenario. The following is found in the REG Glossary under Opponent.

Quote
Several cards in Redemption® refer to “opponent’s cards” (e.g., opponent’s Heroes). For a card to be considered an “opponent’s card”, that player must be the owner of the card as well as have control of the card. An “opponent’s” ability is an ability on an “opponent’s” card.

Yes, but I knew that. I was just showing that according to the rules (at least as I read them(, once a player has Permanent Control of a card, they are considered an owner.

Quote
Owner
When a reference is made to the owner of a card, it means the player from whose deck or Reserve the card originated

Combined with the definition I already said about Permanent Control treating the card as coming from Your Deck, that means that once you gain Permanent Control of a card you are treated as the owner, so Foreign Sword should work. Or did I misinterpret something?

You can't change ownership. Each of the 3 definitions of control (control, temporary control, permanent control) could be argued to change ownership - permanent control is just the bluntest. That should be clarified with the next REG update.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: ChristianSoldier on September 20, 2018, 03:32:26 PM
You can't change ownership. Each of the 3 definitions of control (control, temporary control, permanent control) could be argued to change ownership - permanent control is just the bluntest. That should be clarified with the next REG update.

All you have to do is take out this line in Permanent Control

Quote
If a player has permanent control of a card, then he can treat that card as if it came from his deck.

In fact, I'm not sure what this line could mean, except that it would become "Your" card and be considered and "Opponent's" card for your opponent (and maybe a few other abilities, but I don't feel like going through all the abilities in the game).
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: TheJaylor on September 21, 2018, 09:08:59 PM
So, just to clarify, by the logic of have to take from Reserve and give to opponent to draw, Samuel should be able to search for David or King Saul and NOT put in play in order to not draw then, right? I've heard that's not the case because "and put in play" is a default condition or something but that doesn't really track with KoT then. Or is that just considered old wording now?
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kevinthedude on September 21, 2018, 09:34:24 PM
So, just to clarify, by the logic of have to take from Reserve and give to opponent to draw, Samuel should be able to search for David or King Saul and NOT put in play in order to not draw then, right? I've heard that's not the case because "and put in play" is a default condition or something but that doesn't really track with KoT then. Or is that just considered old wording now?

I don't see any reason why you couldn't put them in hand as long as you don't mind skipping the draw.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: uthminister [BR] on September 21, 2018, 09:59:39 PM
I really want Doomed Canaanites to be a real card PLEASE!
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Kevinthedude on September 21, 2018, 10:00:43 PM
I really want Doomed Canaanites to be a real card PLEASE!

I thought it was?
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: RedemptionAggie on September 21, 2018, 10:08:47 PM
At the bottom of Gabe's spoiler containing the image
This is not an actual card, but a modified version of the black "Doomed" character.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Gabe on September 21, 2018, 11:42:19 PM
So, just to clarify, by the logic of have to take from Reserve and give to opponent to draw, Samuel should be able to search for David or King Saul and NOT put in play in order to not draw then, right? I've heard that's not the case because "and put in play" is a default condition or something but that doesn't really track with KoT then. Or is that just considered old wording now?

That's a great question. On the surface it appears there could be a contradiction. That caused me to do a little digging and I think I've found the answer. I've opened up a discussion with the other elders to ensure we're on the same page. Here's what I found.

Samuel has one "cost" ability (a search which directs you where to put the card so it cannot default to hand) making it one optional ability that results in a mandatory benefit.

KoT has an optional take to hand and an optional give to opponent (two optional "costs"). If both costs are paid you then gain a benefit.

If we printed KoT a few years ago he'd probably be worded similar to Samuel. But since we use "take" now to get cards from locations you don't control (which includes a search but isn't governed by the same rules as search) the rules that apply to Samuel don't apply to KoT.
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: RedemptionAggie on September 22, 2018, 01:57:31 AM
Samuel has one "cost" ability (a search which directs you where to put the card so it cannot default to hand) making it one optional ability that results in a mandatory benefit.

KoT has an optional take to hand and an optional give to opponent (two optional "costs"). If both costs are paid you then gain a benefit.

I think this is the current ruling - "and put it in play" is not a default, but an override of the default and thus is part of the search.

If we printed KoT a few years ago he'd probably be worded similar to Samuel. But since we use "take" now to get cards from locations you don't control (which includes a search but isn't governed by the same rules as search) the rules that apply to Samuel don't apply to KoT.

Or if we printed Samuel today, he'd be "You may play David or King Saul from deck to draw 2." (Ignoring the fact that he probably wouldn't have that ability today.)
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Josh on October 02, 2018, 10:03:11 PM
So I don't know Canaanites but is there many ways to get back your EC that you give to your opponent?  seems like a large cost to pay for a draw 1 if there isn't a few viable ways to get them back

Ahimelek/Isaac and their ilk
Title: Re: Black is weak
Post by: Josh on October 03, 2018, 11:29:08 AM
So, just to clarify, by the logic of have to take from Reserve and give to opponent to draw, Samuel should be able to search for David or King Saul and NOT put in play in order to not draw then, right? I've heard that's not the case because "and put in play" is a default condition or something but that doesn't really track with KoT then. Or is that just considered old wording now?

Samuel has one "cost" ability (a search which directs you where to put the card so it cannot default to hand) making it one optional ability that results in a mandatory benefit.

I can definitely see TheJaylor's reasoning though, since "Search deck for David/Saul" and "Put David/Saul in play" are both distinct abilities.  I think we simply didn't treat them as such back in the day, due to the "If a search tells you to do something with the card" rules.  Which, in hindsight, I don't think we ever truly needed.

I'm trying to mentally map out how Samuel's ability would read (via old ability language using "Search" instead of "Take") if we wanted him to operate the same way as KoT - where you have 2 optional abilities, and you can't carry out the second if you don't carry out the first, and these two optional abilities form the cost for a cost-benefit ability.  Seems to me he'd be worded the same way.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal