Author Topic: What would be better: a pure disciples deck or one with a Paul in it?  (Read 775 times)

Offline slugfencer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • if you don't pay the exorcist you get repossessed
    • -
    • Southeast Region
What would be better: a pure disciples deck or one with a Paul in it?
Not sure which is better and how would they look (deck listing?)
Looking at a fast offense with a fast defense.
Suggestions?
Thanks! :)
If I were ever to challenge you to a duel your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12231
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
0
If you're doing Claysciples/Pharisees I think Paul is an obvious choice.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline slugfencer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • if you don't pay the exorcist you get repossessed
    • -
    • Southeast Region
0
What would a basic decklist for that look like?
If I were ever to challenge you to a duel your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement

 

Templates: 3: index (default), Portal (default), Display (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portal_above, main, portal_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 2: SPortal.english (default), index+Modifications.english (default).
Style sheets: 2: portal (default), gpbp (default).
Files included: 16 - 916KB. (show)
Queries used: 27.

[Show Queries]