Author Topic: Ezekiel Babylonian (Read 2907 times)

Noah · « **on:** February 22, 2012, 12:01:10 PM »

Cards in Deck 100

Good Cards 37

Doms 5

Grapes of Wrath
Son of God
New Jerusalem
Angel of the Lord
Guardian of Your Souls

Forts/Covs 2

Obadiah's Caves
Kerith Ravine

Heroes 16

Ezekiel x2
Hosea x2
Habakkuk x2
Nathan
Micah
Nahum
Joel
Daniel
Michael
Cherubim x4

Good Enhancements 14

Sword of the Lord x3
Two Bears x4
Wheel Within a Wheel x2
Live Coal x2
Striking Herod x3

Neutral Cards 26

Sites 1

Dragon Raid

Enhancements 4

Forest Fire x2
Drawn Sword x2

Arts 7

Chariot of Fire
Hidden Treasures
Hezekiah's Signet Ring
Magic Charms x2
Iron Pan x2

Lost Souls 14

Exchanger x2
FbtN x2
N.T. Only x2
Female Only x2
Revealer x2
10 or Greater x2
Anti Burial x2

Evil Cards 37

Doms 5

Mayhem
Destruction of Nehushtan
Christian Martyr
Burial
Falling Away

Forts/Curses 2

Headquarters at Riblah
Captured Ark

Evil Characters 17

Nebuchadnezzar x2
King Belshazzar x2
Nergalsharezer x2
Nebushasban
Babylonian Soldiers x4
The Winged Lion x2
Astrologers x2
Chaldeans x2

Evil Enhancements 13

Invoking Terror x2
Nebuchadnezzar's Pride x2
Head of Gold x3
Belshazzar's Banquet x3
Swift Horses x3

Nameless · « **Reply #1 on:** February 22, 2012, 05:26:19 PM »

For defense I would put in 2 Great Images. They are great. If you want more info about contact The Hobbit13 he can tell you about great Images in T2 multi.

Jmbeers · « **Reply #2 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:55:07 PM »

I'd be careful about putting in Daniel referenced heroes because they will nerf your neb. Also Neg with Horse is your best bet for playing some really nasty hits on your opp. He can still int, draw 2, and then play Head of Gold all with Iron Pan up on zek. I'd put a Nerg in for one of your bab soldiers.

Red Wing · « **Reply #3 on:** February 22, 2012, 07:14:58 PM »

Quote from: Jmbeers on February 22, 2012, 06:55:07 PM

I'd be careful about putting in Daniel referenced heroes because they will nerf your neb. Also Neg with Horse is your best bet for playing some really nasty hits on your opp. He can still int, draw 2, and then play Head of Gold all with Iron Pan up on zek. I'd put a Nerg in for one of your bab soldiers.

.

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #4 on:** February 25, 2012, 03:45:35 PM »

Quote

Invoking Terror x2
Nebuchadnezzar's Pride x2
Head of Gold x3
Belshazzar's Banquet x3
Swift Horses x3

I really like this deck but do not think this will consistently block. The Banquet's are good, but everything else is negateable. I can see you having to give up points due to negates/not having a battle winner.

Nameless · « **Reply #5 on:** February 25, 2012, 03:53:39 PM »

Quote from: Mr.Hiatus on February 25, 2012, 03:45:35 PM

Quote
Invoking Terror x2
Nebuchadnezzar's Pride x2
Head of Gold x3
Belshazzar's Banquet x3
Swift Horses x3
I really like this deck but do not think this will consistently block. The Banquet's are good, but everything else is negateable. I can see you having to give up points due to negates/not having a battle winner.

Nergal is all the CBN that Babs need.

And It does not look like there is a Nergal in this deck so I suggest adding 2.

Red Wing · « **Reply #6 on:** February 25, 2012, 03:57:32 PM »

Quote from: tripleplayNo3 on February 22, 2012, 12:01:10 PM

Nergalsharezer x2

There is, but he might want more to make up for the lack of CBNs.

Redoubter · « **Reply #7 on:** February 25, 2012, 04:06:01 PM »

Quote from: Red Wing on February 25, 2012, 03:57:32 PM

Quote from: tripleplayNo3 on February 22, 2012, 12:01:10 PM
Nergalsharezer x2
There is, but he might want more to make up for the lack of CBNs.

Don't forget that unless it's prevented, Banquet does just as good. Plus Invoking Terror is *fist-shake* worthy and can do the job as well (in addition to forming a nice combo).

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #8 on:** February 25, 2012, 06:02:36 PM »

Quote

Nergal is all the CBN that Babs need.

You sure about that? Not only is he so easy to get rid of, no real protection, but without his chariot he is nothing. Also it's a lot harder to keep chariots now a days.

Noah · « **Reply #9 on:** March 02, 2012, 12:28:45 PM »

Quote from: Jmbeers on February 22, 2012, 06:55:07 PM

I'd be careful about putting in Daniel referenced heroes because they will nerf your neb.

I can try it without the Daniel heroes, but I can't decide if I should splash in some teal or use the N.T. prophet band instead.

Quote

Also Neg with Horse is your best bet for playing some really nasty hits on your opp. He can still int, draw 2, and then play Head of Gold all with Iron Pan up on zek. I'd put a Nerg in for one of your bab soldiers.

Done.

Quote from: Mr.Hiatus on February 25, 2012, 03:45:35 PM

Quote
Invoking Terror x2
Nebuchadnezzar's Pride x2
Head of Gold x3
Belshazzar's Banquet x3
Swift Horses x3
I really like this deck but do not think this will consistently block. The Banquet's are good, but everything else is negateable. I can see you having to give up points due to negates/not having a battle winner.

Any suggestions on something to change?

Master Q · « **Reply #10 on:** March 02, 2012, 01:15:11 PM »

I would replace 1 Head o' Gold with 1 Great Image. How has Iron Pan worked for you?

Noah · « **Reply #11 on:** March 05, 2012, 04:08:10 PM »

Quote from: Master Q on March 02, 2012, 01:15:11 PM

I would replace 1 Head o' Gold with 1 Great Image. How has Iron Pan worked for you?

Done. I'll also take out Nebushasban for another one. I find that Iron Pan tends to help the offense more than the defense (Usually stopping my opponents horses/ Protect from captures).

Noah · « **Reply #12 on:** March 06, 2012, 06:45:31 PM »

Red Wing · « **Reply #13 on:** March 06, 2012, 07:00:38 PM »

you might consider another HQ @ Riblah. Along with providing protection, it will help get rid of the plethora of captured heroes you may have accumulated.

Jmbeers · « **Reply #14 on:** March 07, 2012, 02:51:18 AM »

Just thought of this but If your playing T2 you'll want much more than just 1 Nebushasban. Because of the choose the soul rule he can be an autoblock.

Master Q · « **Reply #15 on:** March 07, 2012, 11:48:18 AM »

Quote from: Jmbeers on March 07, 2012, 02:51:18 AM

Just thought of this but If your playing T2 you'll want much more than just 1 Nebushasban. Because of the choose the soul rule he can be an autoblock.

The switch of the LS causes a switch in targets, so if your opponent has access to the LS you switched for, it becomes the new chosen soul. It can be an autoblock if you switch for the female or NT only and he's attacking with an OT male. Or something like that, I don't play much T2, so I'm not 100% sure.

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #16 on:** May 19, 2012, 09:31:49 PM »

I'll vouch for the effectiveness of this deck - It could just be that it matches up really well against my deck - But I don't think that's all - I think it's for real. People really underestimate just how much of a mess Iron Pan can be for quite a few offences, and defenses for that matter, the fact that it can be activated with another art is just gravy.

MitchRobStew · « **Reply #17 on:** May 19, 2012, 11:39:09 PM »

I agree this deck gave the deck I used at the t2 only some fits shutting down Thaddeus protection, ET's play, all my drawing, and basically pharisees in general. Thankfully I was running ark x 3, and a ton of anti capture stuff (the new covenant, blue tassels, and bart)...... Plus the offensive build is well thought out w/ the angels getting around all the charms and writs out there.

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: Ezekiel Babylonian (Read 2907 times)

Noah

Ezekiel Babylonian

Nameless

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Jmbeers

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Red Wing

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Mr.Hiatus

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Nameless

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Red Wing

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Redoubter

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Mr.Hiatus

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Noah

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Master Q

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Noah

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Noah

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Red Wing

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Jmbeers

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Master Q

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

Red Dragon Thorn

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian

MitchRobStew

Re: Ezekiel Babylonian