Author Topic: An Arrogance Question  (Read 2723 times)

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
An Arrogance Question
« on: November 30, 2009, 11:10:41 AM »
0
I had a question. If I play arrogance, then a capture card, then Belshazzar's banquet, does my opponent get inititive or would that end the battle, unnegatable?

Arrogance: Holder may play as many enhancements as holder chooses. Inititive passes when holder is done playing enhancements.

Belshazzar's Banquet: Discard all evil cards in battle. Protect all lost souls from being rescued this turn
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2009, 11:13:23 AM »
0
Good question. I'm interested to see the answer to this as well.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2009, 11:28:56 AM »
0
There are several ways to negate an enhancement.

"Negate all enhancements" wouldn't work because it only targets ones that are in play and Bel's Banquet already sent them to the discard pile so they aren't in play.

"Negate the last enhancement" would negate Bel's Banquet even though it is in the discard pile, however it couldn't target the capture because it wasn't the "last enhancement played".  Therefore, it couldn't even be played because the only cards that can be played when a hero is being removed from battle (by capture in this case) are cards that interrupt that removal.

"Negate any enhancement in battle" would normally let the hero choose to negate the capture played earlier.  But in this case it can't because once again it also targets enhancements that are in play, and the capture card is in the discard pile already.

This being the case, I don't think that there is anyway to negate the particular scenario that you have described.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2009, 11:32:15 AM »
0
There is no way to Negate this, because removal from battle only grants special initiative if it causes the removed to lose the battle. At least for Heroes. For some reason, Samson's Sacrifice gives EC's special initiative. But that's beside the point. Except for Samson's Sacrifice, you only get initiative via numbers or special initiative from removal when that removal causes you to be losing the battle.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2009, 11:45:07 AM »
0
removal from battle only grants special initiative if it causes the removed to lose the battle
I don't think this is correct.  I think that characters ALWAYS get "special initiative to negate" if they are being removed from battle by an opposing character.

Edit:
This is obviously assuming that there are no other characters on their side of the battle, or that the characters that remain on their side of the battle are losing (by the numbers, being ignored, etc.)
« Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 05:08:20 PM by Prof Underwood »

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2009, 01:39:07 PM »
0
Oh? RA Armorbearer and King Saul. Block Sabbath Breaker. Snare on King Saul. Five Smooth Stones? If yes, that's news to me.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2009, 01:45:54 PM »
0
Quote
characters ALWAYS get "special initiative to negate"
IF their removal will result in a lost battle.

+1 with MP.

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2009, 02:36:05 PM »
0
Quote
There is no way to Negate this, because removal from battle only grants special initiative if it causes the removed to lose the battle. At least for Heroes. For some reason, Samson's Sacrifice gives EC's special initiative. But that's beside the point. Except for Samson's Sacrifice, you only get initiative via numbers or special initiative from removal when that removal causes you to be losing the battle.

I actually thought this was decided the other way, but It seemed to be one of those threads that have no conclusion.
In AMERICA!!

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2009, 03:58:50 PM »
0
Hey,

After Arrogance (and Belshazzar's Banquet) completes, the hero is being defeated and the evil character is being defeated, so it's mutual destruction by mutual removal caused by the evil character and the evil character played the last card in battle.  So the hero gets initiative but can only play a card that negates or interrupts the ability that is defeating the hero.  As Prof Underwood pointed out most negates will not work in this scenario, but an interrupt the battle ability would.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2009, 05:09:04 PM »
0
Oh? RA Armorbearer and King Saul. Block Sabbath Breaker. Snare on King Saul. Five Smooth Stones? If yes, that's news to me.
Thanks for pointing that out.  I updated my post to include the obvious conditions that I was assuming :)

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2009, 07:46:54 PM »
0
The rulebook clearly states that in a mutual destruction situation, the player who did not play the last card has initiative.  There is nothing "special" about Samson's Sacrifice.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2009, 07:54:10 PM »
0

Offline everytribe

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1063
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2009, 09:05:41 PM »
0
My favorite all time thread on the boards was the Samson's Sacrifice Thread!!!
Old Guys Rule

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2009, 09:17:53 PM »
0
Agreed, I love how we went 9 pages with Schaef vehemently arguing one side, then a page lul where nothing happened besides small jokes, then another 9 pages with Schaef vehemently arguing the other side.....
www.covenantgames.com

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2009, 10:09:58 PM »
0
On a slightly related note regarding "special initiative," if there are two heroes in battle and I capture one and CM the other, can my opponent get a chance to negate?
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: An Arrogance Question
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2009, 10:25:11 PM »
0
Agreed, I love how we went 9 pages with Schaef vehemently arguing one side, then a page lul where nothing happened besides small jokes, then another 9 pages with Schaef vehemently arguing the other side.....

Just remember that thread the next time someone tells you I don't consider multiple sides of an issue or admit to being wrong about something.

On a slightly related note regarding "special initiative," if there are two heroes in battle and I capture one and CM the other, can my opponent get a chance to negate?

If the capture transfers initiative apart from the Dominant, you can negate it.  If the rescuer was still winning after the capture, then no.
http://www.redemptionreg.com/REG/specialconditions26.htm

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal