Author Topic: New Set?  (Read 24608 times)

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2008, 03:03:56 PM »
0
Yeah!...Now I really hope they do make a starter deck.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2008, 03:07:04 PM »
0
I agree that it would be interesting to have a starter set with 2 decks that were very different from each other, rather than just different colors of the same thing.

For instance, one deck could be primarily offensively focused, and the other deck could be primarily defensively focused.  This would still make for a fair match-up against each other, but would also allow a couple of new possibilities for players just beginning.  It would allow people to choose which style they preferred from the time they first start playing the game.  It would also allow a person who bought a starter deck to make a really strong single deck by combining the best of the offense in one deck with the best of the defense in the other :)
I love the idea.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2008, 03:51:38 PM »
0
another realy cool idea would be a booster with a bunch of enh of david and a ton of diferant davids and/or some  diferant musician's and for def it would be realy cool if they did assyrians and/or a buch of grey enh that capture i need a ton of captures right now N.T for my emps but im still gonna keep the cards that go realy good with my emps... :scratch: i still dont know if i want to do that though cause im thinking conversion.... oh i dont know sorry thinking out loud
You mean cards for your emps like
Deadly snare
Demonic snare
Snare
Hard bondage
sryian victory
?
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Sean

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #28 on: October 14, 2008, 01:38:23 PM »
0
Quote from: the musicain
exactly...... but one question how many N.T evil captures are ther? cause i looked yesterday and i found probaly 5 or 7 of them

Quote from: Rafiki
Look harder.

Sean
May you prosper greatly!
Daniel 4:1b

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #29 on: October 14, 2008, 04:13:58 PM »
0
Rafiki is s-m-r-t.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Gil Galad Elven King *Generic

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1809
    • -
    • Southeast Region
    • Phil's Next Kick
Re: New Set?
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2008, 04:37:25 PM »
0
how about instead of starter decks have 4 or 6 or maybe 7 THEME decks........

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2008, 06:59:45 PM »
0
What do you mean?
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Sean

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #32 on: October 15, 2008, 07:09:21 PM »
0
Quote from: Gil Galad Elven King *Generic
how about instead of starter decks have 4 or 6 or maybe 7 THEME decks........
While this would be very cool I do not think it will happen any time in the next several years.  Cactus said that one of the reasons they made RoA 100 cards(promos included) is because they would have been hard pressed to afford a larger set due to how the card printing goes.  However, it was also stated that by making a relatively smaller set now that they would more likely be able to make a larger set in the future.  That said, I would be very surprised if the next set exceeded 100 cards.  That means starter decks are a likely choice since we haven't had new starter in 4 years (counting the 09 season).

Sean
May you prosper greatly!
Daniel 4:1b

thestrongangel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Set?
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2008, 07:55:27 PM »
0
Dude, making structure theme decks would be flippin sweet

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2008, 02:16:50 AM »
0
how about instead of starter decks have 4 or 6 or maybe 7 THEME decks........
It would be cool but cactus doesn't have the funds at least to my knowledge to do 350+ cards for theme decks.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2008, 07:56:39 AM »
0
Yeah...maybe another year.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline robm

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1041
  • RobM Studios
    • -
    • Northeast Region
    • RobM Studios
Re: New Set?
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2008, 08:47:04 AM »
0

Aren't started decks theme decks anyways? G and H Moses and John decks.

It might be interesting to see a type 2 starter deck. Although that would mean 200 cards between the two decks.

Offline sk

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4028
  • I am a leaf on the wind.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • My Facebook
Re: New Set?
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2008, 09:07:58 AM »
0
Or two starters that could somehow be adapted to create a semi-usable Type 2 deck...
"I'm not cheating, I'm just awesome." - Luke Wolfe

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2008, 10:24:19 AM »
0
That may be cool...but it would be difficult and complicated.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2008, 03:07:44 PM »
0
yah i mean typ 2 hat would be like  complicated could you imagine and sience a relgular starter is like $20 or $15 than typ 2 starter would be $40 or $30 so i say just stick with the regulars and plus all you have to do is buy two of the same
Uhm a reg starter is 10 bux.....
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2008, 05:17:26 PM »
0
Yeah, I was just thinking...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #41 on: October 18, 2008, 07:37:34 PM »
0
Issue... One starter could be made into a t2, though not super effective it could. I like the idea of decks that could be combined to make a semi effective t2.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #42 on: October 18, 2008, 10:13:05 PM »
0
I never said it couldn't. Also they could cost less than 20 which if you wanna play t2 thats not much of an issue.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Set?
« Reply #43 on: October 19, 2008, 11:31:06 AM »
0
I wouldn't mind having two starter decks that can be combined for a T2 deck; it'd be a pretty decent idea if it can be pulled off. Other than that though, I wouldn't want to see any major themes or ideas; the whole point of starter decks is for new players to get a bunch of semi-decent cards cheap, making someone like heroless or offensive/defensive heavy would just be disasterous. Take it from someone who - for the first 2 months of playing Redemption - couldn't build a deck worth jack-squat, it's neccesary to have what would be I and J decks as playable right off the bat. Also, I would kill for a Veggie Tales booster pack.

Offline Isildur

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4775
  • Mr. Deacon
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #44 on: October 19, 2008, 05:43:16 PM »
0
But other games have made Two entirely diffrent starters instead of just one. So there could be Type 2 and Type 1 starters made oooh....
3 Prophets Packs ftw

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #45 on: October 19, 2008, 08:26:17 PM »
0
...I'm understanding very little of any of this conversation.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline JSB23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3197
  • Fun while it lasted.
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #46 on: October 19, 2008, 10:53:04 PM »
0
« Last Edit: October 19, 2008, 11:10:12 PM by JSB23 »
An unanswered question is infinitely better than an unquestioned answer.

Offline Sean

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Set?
« Reply #47 on: October 19, 2008, 11:03:01 PM »
0
Quote
http://i32.tinypic.com/293erg6.gif
Awesome.

Sean
May you prosper greatly!
Daniel 4:1b

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: New Set?
« Reply #48 on: October 20, 2008, 01:27:52 AM »
0
That made me laugh in real life.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Set?
« Reply #49 on: October 23, 2008, 12:41:53 PM »
0
You would know, you were the one that put that information there.

Please do not post anything on the Wikipedia page that is not official, confirmed information.  We already have an issue of TPTB questioning whether the game is "notable" enough to include in the wikipedia.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal