Author Topic: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire  (Read 518 times)

Offline ArmedKevin117

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
    • -
    • Northeast Region
A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« on: December 15, 2018, 03:49:46 PM »
0
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2018, 10:20:01 PM »
0
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."
Usage nit:  I think you mean "Precludes (card)"

Offline ArmedKevin117

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: A wording suggestion based on TSC and Chariot of Fire
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2018, 08:54:56 PM »
0
With Chariot of Fire, we now have two doms that share the line "May not be included in a deck with (card)."
I would suggest that any future cards that behave like that shorten it to "Excludes (card)."
Usage nit:  I think you mean "Precludes (card)"

That works too... probably better.

 

Templates: 3: index (default), Portal (default), Display (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portal_above, main, portal_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 2: SPortal.english (default), index+Modifications.english (default).
Style sheets: 2: portal (default), gpbp (default).
Files included: 16 - 916KB. (show)
Queries used: 27.

[Show Queries]